How Sprout Gets It Right, and How Writers Can Too.

I don’t watch Sprout much. (Surprise.) Until this weekend it was just something I would pass through while channel surfing, stopping on it for a minute or two on occasion due to the oddness of the visual.

Yet my sister and her daughter (my niece, of course) spent this weekend here. My niece is nine months old and quite ahead of the intellectual curve in most categories. She is often enraptured by the programming featured on Sprout, and this weekend the television in the living room was tuned into that channel for large blocks of time. And for the first time, I got a sense of some of the programming. I discovered how beneficial it could be…for me.

Yes, me.

Obviously, without my niece being present, I wouldn’t be spending much time watching the likes of “Noodle and Doodle”, “The Super Sproutlet Show”, or “The Wiggles”. Yet as a writer, I try to give credence to anything that both makes use of as well as encourages creativity in others. While much of what one sees on Sprout is in fact educational in a traditional sense, (shapes, numbers, and letters are all covered at various times), the entire focus of the programming is  the expansion of young minds in a less direct but more powerful way-development and encouragement of imagination. It is in this mission that the true genius and nobility of Sprout, (and other child oriented television) lie. It is this that speaks to the writer in me.

If you’ve never seen these channels, I encourage you to take some time to watch them, even if you don’t have children. Yes, I am serious. You don’t have to announce that you’re doing it, and of course you need not watch hours upon hours of it. But if you have free time, and are secure enough in your adulthood, tune in and carefully observe what the show is doing, and how it’s doing it. You’ll notice several recurring elements which are not directly related to “book” learning:

–Asking questions of the viewers.

–Characters talking openly about feelings and ideas.

–Solving of everyday problems.

–“Visiting” characters during the show who live in different types of places, with different cultures.

–Encouragement of viewers to create and to share things.

–Appropriate optimism.

–Zest for living.

And the best part? All of these concepts are presented through the telling of stories.

Now by stories, I don’t just mean when a host sits down to read a book, or when they cut away to a cartoon episode. I mean that almost all concepts that are explored are done via the structure of a story, whether it is being presented directly as a story or not. (In fact, it is usually not labelled as such.) Whether the host of a program must find her missing shoe, or the character in another segment meets a new friend, the situations and concepts a program wants a young person to explore are presented as stories to be consumed.

There are no mundane parts to a show on Sprout. No pipe laying or navel gazing. Every minute is filled with something that engages the viewer in a story. In the use of imagination. Though we writers may not be able to duplicate this formula exactly in our own work, (unless we write for children’s TV), we can take something away from all of this. Namely, that places like Sprout have a luxury that we think we don’t have; they can pursue and share the fantastical 24/7. Wall-to-wall magical story telling, and firing up of imaginations, while still being 100% faithful to life and truth. (If you ignore the talking animals.)

The mind of a child knows no natural cynicism. No duplicity. It exists to absorb not only information, but wonder. Sprout plays to this, and makes no apologies for it. And it works. Even when the story itself doesn’t involve “magic” per say, the concept of presenting the story is infused with a sense of the magical.

So what can we as writers learn from this? What I come away with is that just because our themes mature, our character’s obstacles are more complex, and their worries are greater doesn’t mean that adult writers should steer clear of full-on engagement of our readers’ sense of awe at the universes we create for them. Like the hosts on Sprout, we can share our ideas and our adventures with exuberance. Even if tragic themes are explored in our work, we need not jettison that appeal to wonder in our readers.

We get caught in the trap of believing that our writing must be more intellectual. Tricky. Socially relevant. Thick and complex. That it must somehow upend the very nature of what it means to exist as a human being. That it has to shock, disgust, offend in order to be powerful. And perhaps in certain situations those concepts have their place. (Though I’m on the fence with that.) Yet to me, if we write good fiction,  such high minded intentions should never come at the expense of unabashed immersion in fantasy and imagination, even if our stories are not of the fantasy genre.

Don’t be fooled into thinking that just because you and your readers are adults, that awe and magic must be abandoned in order to assure quality or even significance. In the end, an effective use of magic in some form or another may be the most important factor in inspiring people of all ages to look at you, and, like kids watching Sprout, make the greatest of requests: “Tell me a story.”

Advertisements

5 Comments

  1. I’ve actually never heard of Sprout… haha. But I do know qubo, and I freely admit that I love watching it on the weekends. I like the old episodes of The Magic School Bus, and some of the newer shows have grown on me too. And I don’t have any kids, or any baby nieces to watch it with lol. I never really thought of what I could learn from it in terms of my writing, but I think there is definitely something there. Even though I know (most) of the educational portion of the shows, and there’s nothing terribly complex about the stories, I still find myself invested in the characters enough to see it through to the end. Great post. 🙂

    • Perhaps you should look into Sprout from now on? =) But truly, my point is essentially the same for most child-oriented programming. (Though there is some that is just trash, if you ask me, even by the standards I am mentioning here. No magic just…dumb.)

  2. Ty,
    Your post simply intrigued me. I loved the energy and the points you made about magic and story. Oh yes, I’m sure C. S. Lewis would agree with you on that one. I was just thinking about the character who plays the Professor in the first Chronicles of Narnia film (the one made by Wonderworks), and how he said, “I’m absolutely delighted to be interrupted.” He loved to have fun. And adults need to regain that sense of wonder and awe you mentioned, the magic of the exuberance of life. Children have it, and we should regain it. We’d be the better for it.

    Thanks so much for sharing your point of view and your humor; I simply enjoyed.

    Be refreshed,
    Dawn Herring

  3. Jean Oram

    What I like about kid shows is the simplicity. There is a bit of a formula that keeps the story on track. The kids know what is expected. There will be a problem. It will be solved. The same with our readers, right? They know we’ll deliver a problem and then solve it in an interesting way.

    • Very good way of putting it. And when you don’t deliver on that basic premise, kids will notice it. They may not be able to pinpoint why something isn’t working, but they will sense it doesn’t. Readers, by extension, are not stupid as an entity either. Laziness is death in writing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: